Geographical information about where this report originated or about its content. Zanotti, Jim.
- Resources for Local Activism on PALESTINE!
- Israel: Background and U.S. Relations by Jim Zanotti, Paperback | Barnes & Noble®.
- The Complex History of the U.S.-Israel Relationship.
Israel: Background and U. Relations in Brief , report , February 12, ; Washington D. You Are Here: home unt libraries government documents department this report. Showing of 16 pages in this report. Description This report discusses Israel's relations with the U. Physical Description 16 pages.
Mapped Search. Who People and organizations associated with either the creation of this report or its content. Publisher Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. Place of Publication: Washington D. About Browse this Partner. What Descriptive information to help identify this report. Foreign relations -- U. Language English. Four years later, a group of Palestinian and radical left-wing German terrorists hijacked a plane and held 94 Israelis hostage in Entebbe, Uganda.
Israeli military special forces succeeded in freeing most of the hostages and killing the hijackers. West Germany supported the raid, calling it an act of "self-defense. Ehud Barak left made a number of visits to Germany during his time as Israeli prime minister and defense minister. The fall of the Berlin Wall and de facto end of the Cold War in presented Israel with a conundrum. On the one hand, Israelis welcomed the demise of Communist East Germany, which had always been hostile to Israel.bbmpay.veritrans.co.id/del-dating-de-la-palma.php
The Current Situation: Israel, The Palestinian Territories, and the Arab-Israeli Conflict
Those worries proved to be unfounded. In the years following reunification, German-Israeli ties grew closer and closer with a series of firsts. In , Yitzhak Rabin became the first Israeli government leader to visit reunified Germany, and in Israeli President Ezer Weizman was the first foreign head of state to address the reunified German parliament, the Bundestag. In , Israel was the first foreign country officially visited by German President Roman Herzog, and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak was the first foreign leader received when the German government moved from Bonn to Berlin in Although differences persist between Germany and Israel , for instance over the issue of whether Jerusalem should be recognized as the Israeli capital and Jewish settlements on Palestinian territory , ties between the two countries have only deepened under Chancellor Angela Merkel.
In , to mark the 60th anniversary of the founding of Israel, Merkel became the first German chancellor to speak before the Israeli parliament.
That means that for me as German chancellor Israel's security is non-negotiable. After that speech, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert characterized Merkel as "a very important European and world leader, and a great friend of Israel. Berlin may not be the "new Jerusalem," nor is Germany a Shangri-la for disaffected Israelis, as is sometimes proclaimed in the media. That statistic speaks volumes about the progress made toward establishing a positive, if never completely easy relationship between Germany and Israel.
Gabriel has said that Germany has a special role in fighting anti-Semitism. While official statistics attribute most such crimes to right-wing extremists, a new study argues anti-Semitism is widespread among refugees. For 10 days, the Munich Olympics showcased the joy of sports.
German-Israeli relations: What you need to know | In Depth | DW |
Then, terror struck. Germany's mishandling of the hostage crisis and a botched rescue attempt led to the formation of the GSG 9 tactical police unit. This proved to be a very mixed blessing. These new costs were hardly visible in the s. Part of the bill for the Iraq war can be attributed to Israel, as can the cost still to be determined of a possible confrontation with Iran. Perhaps ironically, as the costs rose, American politicians became more fervent than ever in expressing their devotion to Israel and the special relationship. The initial post-Cold War test of Israel as a strategic asset came in , during the first Iraq war.
As a regional ally, Israel proved worse than useless. Bush was building against Saddam Hussein. The United States diverted Patriot missile batteries to Israel to keep it on the sidelines, leaving its own forces more vulnerable. By the mid-nineties, however, Israel and its American boosters were seeking new rationales for the special relationship.
In his recent book Israel and the Clash of Civilizations, Jonathan Cook traces these recommendations to themes worked up by several right-wing Israeli strategists in the s. As Oded Yinon, an Israeli journalist and former senior Foreign Ministry official, put it in a essay,. Cook contends that strategists such as Yinon did not simply sell their vision to the neoconservatives and seek its implementation. The neocons interpreted these strategies as not only good for Israel, but good for America. However, as an examination of a public record, where ideas emerging from both Israeli and neoconservative discourse reflect and build on one another over time, it is extremely suggestive.
It helps to explain the seemingly inexplicable: the American decision to allow Iraq to fall into chaos after the invasion. Counting in a more comprehensive manner, the price the United States pays for the special relationship with Israel has become one of across-the-board friction with much of the Muslim world, friction that would be greatly attenuated without the special relationship and might not exist at all. Whereas in the Soviet Union, the United States had one strategic enemy in a relatively stable contest for global dominance, it now faces opponents on many fronts.
First, there is the price of terrorism. American backing of Israel has been a major, if not the sole, factor in making the United States a target of Muslim terrorists. This is invariably what such terrorists say, whether in custody or at liberty, and no one has explained plausibly why they would misrepresent their motivations.
Protecting the Right to Boycott
Ramzi Yousef, mastermind of the attack on the World Trade Center, mailed a letter to several New York newspapers demanding that the United States cut off aid to Israel. After his arrest, he told agents that he felt guilt over American civilian deaths but his desire to stop the killing of Arabs by Israeli troops was stronger. Osama bin Laden began inserting references to Palestine into his public statements in No other issue shapes the regional perception of America more fundamentally than the issue of Palestine. Prominent commentators like Robert Satloff, director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, acknowledge such sentiments while dismissing their importance.
- Israel: Background and U.S. Relations.
- Resources for Local Activism on PALESTINE - Arab American Institute!
- Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief!
- The Cannons at the Gate (Eagle Canyon Squadron Book 1).
- The Dream Dog.
- 2012 Smart Grid System Report to Congress - Smart Electric Meters, Renewables Integration, Electric Cars and Vehicles, Transmission Automation, Grants and Programs, Cyber Security, Energy Efficiency;
In a recent debate with Chas W. Freeman, Jr. Arab governments will support U. They are voiced without fear of ridicule, the instant response that would have greeted a claim that the political feelings of Czechs or Poles or Chinese or anyone else living under politically unfree conditions could be discounted as inconsequential.
In its third stage, the Israel alliance has drawn the United States into the Middle East in a particularly violent way. Over the last decade, cities in Iraq, Lebanon and Gaza have been ripped apart by U. While mass antiwar protests broke out across Europe, there were none in Israel, where The Israeli support for the war would not, in itself, be decisive in pushing the president to order the attack, but deference to Israeli sensibilities is what is unique about the special relationship.
When Israelis talk, Americans listen. When Israelis want to circulate their views, they have an access to the opinion pages of elite newspapers and slots on network news shows that leaders of no other foreign country can dream of. If Israeli leaders had voiced similar sentiments, it is inconceivable the invasion would have taken place. In its wake, Israelis and American friends of that country have worked overtime to rewrite history and absolve Israel of any responsibility for the disaster.
But, even if it were likely that Israel preferred the United States to attack Iran, Israeli leaders lobbied energetically for a war against Iraq. The weak Saddam regime was low-hanging fruit, after all.